The Artistry of Julia Child Part 2: Invisible Lines

This is Part 2 of The Artistry of Julia Child. Here’s Part 1, about latebloomers.

writing desk
My writing desk. Helen Ellis says in Southern Lady Code that “creative” is Southern Lady Code for “slob.”

Throughout my life, I often thought I’d like to find my purpose, my means. Then when I found it, I wanted it to be be some other purpose than the one I got: writing. “Writing is stupid,” I’d say, sniffling to my husband the same way I once cried when my sister got the better toy. “That’s how you know you’re really a writer,” my husband would quip, he with much less doubt than me, his lack of doubting making me question his IQ.

For me, just knowing what I’m meant to do hasn’t made feeling confident about it any easier. I’m in a writing group and one of my goals has been just to introduce myself to people I meet as a writer.

That’s it.

Not as a writer and stay-at-home mom; not a writer who copyedits for money; not a writer but of poetry, which really what is poetry “about” anyway, do you know where the restroom is?

Some of my most remarkable friends don’t think they’re up to any good. They feel they’re behind or have missed their chance or are too weird for words or not good enough for jobs or kids or they aren’t doing enough. Their families or in-laws or mentors or cohort don’t get it. They receive lots of unsolicited advice.

This has me thinking about invisible lines. Lots of these lines (or planes) are drawn on our lives by others (for instance, the glass ceiling). But I’ve drawn lots of lines for myself in invisible ink and treated them as though they’re laser beams, that if I touch one in trying to maneuver my own path through, I’ll set off the booby trap that reveals me as who I am.

Last month, I talked about Julia Child, who followed her sense of “je m’enfoutisme!”— an intuition to not care what happens but to learn. She followed it from California to working in intelligence during World War II. She followed it into marriage and cooking lessons and through many drafts of an incredibly long cookbook. From the outside, it looks joyful, like the life of someone who just trusts herself and knows what she likes.

But I don’t think that’s the lived experience. Someone has to be pretty brave to follow intuition. To say, “You don’t see what I see, but that’s all right. I’m not hallucinating.”

It can look to the outside world like sheer insanity, or, at best, like you need your prescription adjusted.

There’s a William Stafford poem, “The Way It Is,” that resonates with this as well:

There’s a thread you follow. It goes among
things that change. But it doesn’t change.
People wonder about what you are pursuing.
You have to explain about the thread.
But it is hard for others to see.
While you hold it you can’t get lost.
Tragedies happen; people get hurt
or die; and you suffer and get old.
Nothing you do can stop time’s unfolding.
You don’t ever let go of the thread.

Child’s life, now preserved under history’s glass case, looks seamless. But of course it was full of threads. A spool she unwound and unwound that only she could see. Society women jobs in her youth; espionage support and a move abroad in young adulthood; and then a cooking empire. We can tell the story, but there’s no way that looked like a clear trajectory at the time.

Ah, yes, but the thread! (But the thread!)

And there’s the thread I follow.

It’s also a nearly invisible line. When I don’t follow the thread, I regret it. And it doesn’t matter if not following the thread has made conversation at the holidays easier, or has made my peers respect me more, or more people read my work, or has made me more money.

People can critique it, but I have to live on the side of the line that I draw. People can say I’m headed nowhere (or straight to hell!), and maybe I am, but I have hold of the thread.

As a new parent, I’m constantly losing the threads of my thoughts, of my conversations. A few weeks before I went into labor, I checked the refrigerator for my keys. It seemed likely that I’d put them there. At that same time, I had just started reading Operating Instructions by Anne Lamott. In it, Lamott describes following her thread—as a West Coast Bay Area Christian alcoholic in recovery, a novelist, raising her son as a single mother during his first year of life. She writes like she’s your best friend, and more often than not, I find that’s what I’m looking for these days. In that time, her actual best friend, Pammy, gets diagnosed with advanced cancer; Lamott isn’t sure how she’ll make financial ends meet; all the swimmy feelings of new motherhood happen. And then she remembers a program on TV, with its invisible lines:

I heard this amazing East Indian doctor talking about autistic kids back East who were so severely withdrawn that if you stood them up, they’d just fall over. They’d make no effort to stand or even to shield their faces when they fell. Then these people working with them discovered that if they ran a rope from one end of the room to the other and stood the kids up so that they were holding on to the rope, the kids would walk across the room. So over the months they kept putting up thinner and thinner pieces of rope, until they were using something practically invisible, like fishing line, and the kids would still walk across the room if they could hold onto it. And then—and this really seems like a brainstorm—the adults cut the fishing line into pieces, into twelve-inch lengths or something, and handed one to each kid. The kids would still walk. What an amazing statement of faith.

… I feel like every time the phone rings and it’s Pammy and she needs to talk about this horrible thing that’s happening now, or, come to think of it, every night when I don’t get any sleep and then the baby is crying to be fed at 6 a.m., or every day when I sit down and try to get a little bit of writing done, that I am clutching my little piece of fishing line as I go to the phone or the crib or my desk.

And how can I be so courageous as to be the person who I am without apology or explanation? To say I see what you don’t or can’t or won’t see? I guess I’ll carry my foot of fishing line. Maybe thinking of a line I don’t draw in the sand but plumb into water: this fishing line I’ve brought with me, all these years, to reel in a creature or old boot from a body of water—the line connects me to what’s tugging at me and I’m working to reel whatever it is that I want but can’t see in. I don’t draw the line: I just hang on as the line draws me.

To follow an invisible thread, as Lamott notes, we need faith in ourselves and our art. We also need to be faithful to ourselves and our art. This second kind of faithfulness bolsters the first, drawing us nearer to each other. This second kind of faith, I’ll call it devotion.

In 2020, I’ll be sending an Artist’s Devotional entry once a week to your inbox to help you explore your relationship to your writing. Like a religious devotional, we’ll consider the parables, lives, paths, and vows of those who have come before and consider how to construct our own; unlike a religious devotional, we’ll be faithful to our art, writing.

If you’d like to join in, simply email “Yes” and your name to Lindsey@LDAlexander.com, and I’ll put you on the email list.

If you’d like to read more of my writing, subscribe to my monthly newsletter or read my book, Rodeo in Reverse.

Poem I Loved This Month: September 2019

The poem I’ve loved this month is “I Cannot Say I Did Not” by Sharon Olds. If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you know I usually feature a few poems. This month, just this one. This is the one poem I’ve really loved this month. The essay that follows examines it alongside a little bit of early motherhood.

After writing my birth story, I welled with tears. I kept writing—past the sight of him, past Jon singing him his first song out here, past the extended hospital stay and coming home and debating whether to open ice cream, even past pronouncements and Unabomber ramblings on love and meaning. I didn’t want it to end. Already, the push-pull of grief and joy at him growing, learning. My life, for me, feels perfect—and some grief in the realization that this overwhelming happiness, this cheery monotony, is temporary—in the same way that used to bring me relief (“This is temporary. This is only temporary.”).

Every day is full. Just finishing what I once considered basic tasks—going to the grocery, drinking a cup of coffee (hardly ever warm by the time I finish it), reading a short chapter—feel like monumental achievements. My son is healthy and beautiful. My husband is beautiful and kind. Our yard is unmowed. My hair is undone. I saw two groundhogs in my neighbor’s yard, and one of them (at least) spends his nights burrowing underneath our porch. Laundry multiplies like rabbits. Time disappears like quarters into a jukebox—six in a go. I must remind myself to eat; otherwise I forget until late in the day, at some inconvenient hour, holding a baby and calming a dog. I spend free minutes at my desk, writing. Writing what? The disappointment, I realize, eyes welling over my notebook, eventually just drawing a heart at the end of the story like a middle-schooler in love, is that I cannot put into language how glorious it all is. I can’t even remember it all now, much less get it all down. (Cue Emily in Our Town.) How the means themselves are the ends, how all of this was here before it was here and is gone even now. If I risk sounding precious, it’s because … I feel it all preciously. But my lack of language, or my lack of skill at employing it, will cost me the bulk of my memory of this time. Like how even in photos Wendell almost never looks quite Wendell. I don’t know that at the page I’ve ever felt like I had so many things to say and so little ability, so few words—mostly redundant—to say them.

But then a friend* posted this poem: “I want to say that love / is the meaning, but I think that love may be / the means, what we ask with.”

“I Cannot Say I Did Not” by Sharon Olds proves to me someone somewhere begins to have the language, a language generous and sparse enough.

This morning, Wendell was still sleeping—Jon had gotten him to go back to sleep, I lay there smiling into the dark like I imagine murderers do right before a kill—watching all I couldn’t see but knew was there around me: the dog whistling after a rodent in her sleep; Jon passed out, soon to be dazed and glaring into the glow of his phone for the time, deciding whether to bike or drive, Wendell heaving out little breaths, still (God willing) a “long portion” left. I was so content at all of this—and at the possibility of sleep—I lay there wakeful, breasts pained, overfull with milk, waiting for the day to meet me.

The line breaks in life, not “needing to be drained” but simply “needing to be (line break) drained.” Enjambment like a door jamb, one that dictates how quietly, how secretly, one can enter or exit a room, whether I’ll wake the baby. This door jamb isn’t square—light slips in, that little emphasis on “needing to be.”

This day I felt like even the sun, the day, was waiting on me to have this moment. (In point of fact, it’s fall, and the sun’s just coming up later every day.)

And then Wendell, not just my baby orbiting out from me further and further into personhood, but a wanting lodged within me forever—like a bullet left in the soldier, it wounds and protects. This sense that, no, none of us is a singular human; we’re all the detritus of ourselves—our outgrown clothes and fingernail clippings and abandoned summer gardens and diapers that have never biodegraded—and our forebears and all the things we may be—our future interests, our child in a bassinet in the dark, our dog on a walk darting at bicyclists while we avoid eye contact and apologize. And yes, the more sinister and slipperier histories and mistakes—a father’s “desire / for his orgasms and for [a] mother’s money.” We are the disappointments of who we can never be—“my mother’s longing for a son” and proof of injustices big or small—“patriarchy” but also a life of handmedowns. “Before I existed, I asked, with the love of my / children, to exist, and with the love of their children.”

Anaphora feels right: I asked, I asked, I asked. A literary device that can feel, to me, cheap—easy to sound right or deep or true, but be false, a way to get into a draft, scaffolding. I’m always suspicious of it when I’m reading. (Is the author trying to emotionally manipulate me? Is this adding an unearned, heightened drama?) But motherhood, repetitive, and childhood becomes a series of endless questions we learn to vocalize or enact until, as adults, we repeat them—often halfheartedly or less hopefully, in arguments or breakups or narrated over drinks or to therapists or priests. Sometimes I’ve become so cynical I’ve shoved the questions aside as kid’s stuff. I think a lot of us do that. Somewhere between toughening or sucking it up. But as Wislawa Szymborska says, “The most pressing questions are naïve ones.” Not Rilke’s “loving the questions” that’s quoted so much as a way of getting good with uncertainty, but love as the questions; love is the question—“what we ask with”—the articulation of asking to be.

And where the sentences don’t begin with “I asked” we get that turn (which she underscores by breaking a line on the word “turn”):

The repetition cut with something new is like the record scratch of the poem, right in the middle of the song, right when you’re getting in your groove as a reader. The first is an underscoring: “Before I existed, I asked …,” almost like a little improvisation to keep the melody interesting, though it does call attention to how serious the whole business is—this asking. Then the asking about the asking, essentially: “Did I ask with life or did I ask with death?” With breath or with the ground that will swallow me? Both? Then a return to the refrain: “I asked, with everything I did not have, to be born.” It’s the last time, and the rest of the poem drops it for the grand finale: which is abstract, rather than concrete, like the rest of the poem: “And nowhere in any /of it was there meaning, there was only the asking / for being, and then the being, the turn / taken. I want to say that love / is the meaning, but I think that love may be / the means, what we ask with.”

Lots of poems end in epiphany, a form so tried and true, it’s cliched, it’s expected. But Olds earns it. The means of her poem justify its end. (Puns always intended, thank you.)

And now I think, this morning, awake when I should’ve been sleeping, I was asking. I was asking with this moment, “with everything I did not / have, to be born.” And maybe, Wendell, unknowingly, out like a light, in this moment, was, too, through me. And today, poems didn’t seem more stupid than anything else. Still, I can’t say something like, “Poetry saved my life.” Life saved my life. Poetry deepens it. It’s been one of my ways of asking.

I’m so thankful today, dark again, for all the asking.

If you enjoyed this postsign up for my monthly letter, and get essays on the creative process, plus some sweet jams, poems I like, and other tasty tidbits. Order my poetry collection, Rodeo in Reverse, here.

*That friend is the poet Jessica Farquhar. Check her out.

Medtech opinion piece featured on LinkedIn Today

Medtech opinion piece featured on LinkedIn Today

Medtech uses the word innovation a lot. According to PwC, so much that the word’s lost its charge. In this fun Jetson-inspired, end-of-year piece for MedCity News, I was able to think about what would really stand out in our minds ten years from now. I included what will still be awe-inspiring and what we may recoil from as awesomely bad, as well as some discussion on major policy shifts for the industry.

Be sure to click the link above, bookmark it and call me in a decade to shame me or offer me pats on the back.

This story was picked up by LinkedIn Today for its Healthcare section.

December Veteran Story

When an unstoppable grade school girl found out her friend, a World War II veteran, hadn’t received his medals for his service, heads were bound to roll. Talking to Leanna’s mother and Mr. Mowbray, the veteran, it became clear to me how serious this student was, how true a friend and how fiery a spark plug.

Read this inspiring story of how one girl’s perseverance led to a quiet man receiving his due 67 years late.

Her quest began during a school project to record veterans’ stories for the Library of Congress. Listen to his war stories here.

More on writer’s block and the battle for clarity

Again, another accurate description of writer’s block. Get up nerve, punch the page, tie your shoe, go home. Suck blood from scabs (What? Who said that?), replace bandages, rinse, repeat.

September Veteran Story

September Veteran Story

Talking with Eugene Prieto about his quest to find out the truth about his uncle Roaul, who was KIA in World War 2. Roaul died when Eugene was just a boy. It shook him. Rather than accepting the terms of this tragedy, Eugene has pushed as far as Congress to get his uncle the peace in afterlife he feels he deserves. Click on the link above to read the story.

How to know what you want to write about

 

calvin and hobbes writing

Sportswriter and Southerner extraordinaire Tommy Tomlinson shared the four questions he uses to help writers figure out what they want to write about in a great post.

For the descriptions of how to answer the questions, visit his post. But for a quick preview, here’s the skinny:

1. What do you know about?

2. What do you care about?

3. What are you curious about?

4. What scares you?

Ay yi yi. Short but big questions, no?

Feature: Small Ohio town pays tribute to its lost son

A vet at the American Legion, post 70 in Ohio, started this story by sending a link to a Wikipedia article about Pfc. Melvin Newlin, a young man who was KIA during Vietnam and posthumously received the Medal of Honor.

I was able to talk to one of his sisters, a brother, a former reporter, and a few townspeople who shared his story. Everyone from Wellsville seemed to know his story.

Image

Newlin’s story is in some ways remarkable, but it doesn’t seem so to those that knew him. As his brother Joe said, “It wasn’t difficult for me to believe. I knew what he’d do. I knew what he was like.”

Click here to read his full story, one of valor, tragedy, and community.